Translator

English flagItalian flagKorean flagChinese (Simplified) flagChinese (Traditional) flagPortuguese flagGerman flagFrench flagSpanish flag
Japanese flagArabic flagRussian flagGreek flagDutch flagBulgarian flagCzech flagCroat flagDanish flag
Finnish flagHindi flagPolish flagRumanian flagSwedish flagNorwegian flagCatalan flagFilipino flagHebrew flag
Indonesian flagLatvian flagLithuanian flagSerbian flagSlovak flagSlovenian flagUkrainian flagVietnamese flagAlbanian flag
Estonian flagGalician flagMaltese flagThai flagTurkish flagHungarian flag   

Not bad hosting


Quality or Quantity?

Hey all, I wanted to start a quick poll. Of course we all know the saying “You get what you pay for”. With quality also means slightly higher prices. Wanting to aim in towards quality, at the moment we’ve got a range of Dell and IBM rack unit servers rather than the cheaper tower servers (referring more to unbranded tower servers). We have also started to get into blade technology but we’re finding it hard with the higher prices, keeping stock is also harder. With tower servers, there is no specific RAM model requirement for this, no CPU specific etc. So you can basically mix and match (within limits). However with branded blade and rack units its a lot harder. What are your thoughts in regards to tower servers, do you recommend them, would you purchase them, would you prefer them over the rack unit or blade servers because they are cheaper etc Looking for your opinions and thoughts! ~Andrew

View post: 
Quality or Quantity?

Bookmark and Share

Related posts:

  1. Blade Servers or Rack Servers? « Jason Nash's Blog
  2. Quantity or Quality
  3. WTS 100% Cheapest Hosting - It's Quality - Do you prefer quality …
  4. WTS 100% Cheapest Hosting - It's Quality - Do you prefer quality …
  5. » Google Pagerank is directly related to the quantity and quality …

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>